Legislature(2017 - 2018)BARNES 124
04/11/2018 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB357 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 357 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 108 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE LABOR AND COMMERCE STANDING COMMITTEE
April 11, 2018
3:15 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Sam Kito, Chair
Representative Adam Wool, Vice Chair
Representative Andy Josephson
Representative Louise Stutes
Representative Chris Birch
Representative Gary Knopp
Representative Colleen Sullivan-Leonard
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Mike Chenault (alternate)
Representative Bryce Edgmon (alternate)
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 357
"An Act relating to alcoholic beverages; relating to the
regulation of manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, and common
carriers of alcoholic beverages; relating to licenses,
endorsements, and permits involving alcoholic beverages;
relating to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; relating to
offenses involving alcoholic beverages; amending Rule 17, Alaska
Rules of Minor Offense Procedure; and providing for an effective
date."
- HEARD & HELD
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 108(FIN)
"An Act relating to the State Medical Board; relating to the
licensing of physicians, osteopaths, and podiatrists; relating
to the certification of medical assistants; relating to the
practice of medicine; relating to the practice of podiatry;
relating to the practice of osteopathy; relating to assault of a
medical professional; and providing for an effective date."
- BILL HEARING POSTPONED
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 357
SHORT TITLE: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL/REGULATION
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) KOPP
02/16/18 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/16/18 (H) L&C, JUD
04/11/18 (H) L&C AT 3:15 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE CHUCK KOPP
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented HB 357 as prime sponsor.
ANNA BRAWLEY, Title 4 Project Coordinator
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented a PowerPoint on Alcoholic
Beverage Control (ABC) Board, Title 4 Review Project.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:21:06 PM
CHAIR SAM KITO called the House Labor and Commerce Standing
Committee meeting to order at 3:15 p.m. Representatives Birch,
Knopp, Sullivan-Leonard, Josephson, Wool, and Kito were present
at the call to order. Representative Stutes arrived as the
meeting was in progress.
HB 357-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL/REGULATION
3:21:32 PM
CHAIR KITO announced that the only order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 357, "An Act relating to alcoholic beverages;
relating to the regulation of manufacturers, wholesalers,
retailers, and common carriers of alcoholic beverages; relating
to licenses, endorsements, and permits involving alcoholic
beverages; relating to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board;
relating to offenses involving alcoholic beverages; amending
Rule 17, Alaska Rules of Minor Offense Procedure; and providing
for an effective date."
3:22:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP, Alaska State Legislature, presented HB 357
as prime sponsor. He explained that Alaska alcohol laws have
not been updated since the early 1980s and the industry has
evolved at a rate with which the statutes have not kept pace.
He said the aim of the proposal is to ensure that enforcement
can be carried out. He added it offers clear and defined
statutes for just outcomes. He introduced Ms. Brawley and spoke
to the history of the proposal.
3:25:50 PM
ANNA BRAWLEY, Title 4 Project Coordinator, presented a
PowerPoint on Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Board, Title 4
Review Project [included in committee packet]. She gave a brief
overview of the history of the project and presented the goals:
make Title 4 a clear and consistent legal framework; increase
swiftness, proportionality and consistency of penalties;
increase local law enforcement of Title 4; and increase licensee
accountability before the ABC Board for Title 4 violations. She
added that to date there has been approximately 6 years of work
for a total of 12,000 hours in the project.
MS. BRAWLEY pointed out that the project involves five topic-
based subcommittees which operate under the steering committee.
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP asked about the local option subcommittee
and what they were charged to do.
MS. BRAWLEY said the subcommittee looked at communities' ability
to vote to restrict alcohol in statute.
3:30:45 PM
MS. BRAWLEY moved to slide 10 to present the sectional summary,
which reads as follows:
• AS 04. Chapter 6: sections 1 - 8, pp. 1 - 5
• AS 04. Chapter 9: section 9, pp. 5 - 49
• AS 04. Chapter 11: sections 10 - 72, pp. 50 79
• AS 04. Chapter 16: sections 73 - 121, pp. 79 - 97
• AS 04. Chapter 21: sections 122 - 136, pp. 97 - 104
• Other Titles' Changes: sections 137 148, pp. 104
109
• Transition: sections 149 159, pp. 109 114
MS. BRAWLEY presented the six categories of recommendations in
slide 11:
1. Alcohol Licenses, Permits and Trade Practices
2. Role and Functions of the ABC Board and Staff
3. Underage Drinking and Youth Access to Alcohol
4. Regulation of Internet Sales of Alcohol
5. Technical or Administrative Law Changes
6. Local Option Communities*
* Note: Local Option recommendations are documented in
the report, but not included in HB 357. More
comprehensive discussion of Local Option laws is
needed in the future.
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP stated his concern about local options was
that, given the fiscal situation, communities could be given
some of the responsibilities currently held by the state.
CHAIR KITO said that one of the issues that has arisen regarding
local options is the Bethel, Alaska, decision and the
consequences of that decision.
3:34:14 PM
MS. BRAWLEY continued to slide 12-18 detailing the key concepts
of Title 4:
• The 3-tier system: separation of manufacturers,
wholesalers and retailers to prevent monopolies
• Population limits: regulates number of licenses
available in each community by type
• Licenses and permits:
o License: allows a business to sell,
serve, distribute and/or manufacture
alcohol for 2 years.
o Permit: time-limited alcohol sales or
service, by a licensee or non-licensed
organization.
• Proposed new concept: Endorsements on licenses to
expand premises or allowed activities
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked about "changing trends and values" and
how they have affected the rewrite of Title 4.
MS. BRAWLEY gave the examples of online sales and direct sales
of craft manufacturing.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked about the three-tier system. He
disclosed that he holds a beverage license and is subject to the
laws in question. He asked about tensions in the industry.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that the tensions do still exist. She
added that the proposed law was not attempting to be the "be all
and end all" of the issue.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked about the distinctions between
boroughs and cities and about population limits for the purposes
of regulation.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that population limits had been examined.
The stakeholder group had concluded that no changes would be
suggested, with a couple of exceptions.
3:44:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked about exclusions from the population
count. He asked why children were not excluded.
MS. BRAWLEY answered the count was not directly related to the
census.
3:45:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL spoke to the introduction of the new license
for tasting rooms. He asked about discussions of eliminating
the quota system.
MS. BRAWLEY shared her understanding that language on tasting
rooms was added to the current license and was not a new
license. She said the group had opted not to keep the
discussion on the table because there was no consensus.
3:47:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SULLIVAN-LEONARD mentioned the supporting
documentation for the bill. She asked why some allowed types
[of licenses] for population density are not in compliance with
the new proposal.
CHAIR KITO asked whether there is any interested in getting
closer to the limit with the bars and retail establishments that
currently exist.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that some businesses had been grandfathered
in and this was reflected in the high density in some areas.
She said the statute does not contemplate the total number of
licenses in an area, only each type. She added that the
stakeholders had opted not to add a new license type every time
a new issue emerged.
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP pointed to the table on slide 16 and asked
for an explanation of population limits.
3:50:11 PM
CHAIR KITO pointed out that there are separate limits applied to
cities and to boroughs. He said that [on the slide] the icons
in teal represent licenses exempt from population limits, and
the icons in goldenrod represent part of the license limits.
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP suggested there are population limits in
cities, and they just depend on the type of license.
MS. BRAWLEY answered in the affirmative.
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP asked about population calculations for
boroughs versus cities.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that the population for incorporated cities
would be excluded as they have their own licenses.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked about the purpose of the population
limit. He asked whether most cities exceed the population
limit.
MS. BRAWLEY answered the most cities do have more licenses than
statute would allow and suggested that is due to grandfathered
licenses.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP added that the population limit protects the
value of the license as well as public safety.
3:54:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked why population limits are so "out of
whack" with statute.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP said the motivation behind the proposed
bills is the seeming randomness and disparity of license
allocation. He reiterated that effort is to standardize the
system.
3:56:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked whether licenses are not
transferable in the new bill.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that existing licenses can be grandfathered
so do not go away.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked whether a grandfathered business can
transfer the license.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that population limits do not apply to
individual licenses.
3:57:44 PM
CHAIR KITO remarked that the working group seems to recognize
the issue was politically volatile and said that the working
group had stated it did not have consensus. He said the issue
of the number of licenses per population should be addressed
legislatively.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked whether a cap on licenses was
being proposed.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP answered there is nothing in the proposed
law that would cause licenses to proliferate. He said it would
allow the ABC Board to be more responsive to the changing
dynamics of communities. He said he was very sensitive to
devaluing current licenses.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL commented the recent addition of on-premise
tasting rooms does affect existing licenses.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP said the proposed bill has not passed yet.
4:01:20 PM
MS. BRAWLEY addressed the role of the Alcoholic Beverage Control
Board ("ABC Board"). She outlined the recommendations as
follows:
• Designate the ABC Board and AMCO as the agency to
develop a multi-department, public-private sector
education plan about responsible alcohol use and
applicable laws.
• Coordinate with Department of Health and Social
Services and other agencies tasked with alcohol-
related education.
4:05:24 PM
MS. BRAWLEY spoke to the recommendation to establish a written
order database.
• Allow data about direct shipment orders of
alcohol in local option communities to be made
publicly available, aggregated at the region or
community level, for analysis and community
planning.
• Written order database can only be accessed by
AMCO enforcement staff, other law enforcement,
and package store licensees who fill written
orders.
• Personal information would be kept confidential.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked what would be done with the
information collected in the database.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that information would be collected to give
local communities information on how much alcohol is coming into
the community.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON suggested the information would be used
by some entity.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP answered the information would be for
communities and law enforcement to understand the flow of
alcohol in the area.
4:10:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked about fees.
MS. BRAWLEY deferred to AMCO staff.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP added that the fees also pay for the public
health education.
MS. BRAWLEY said most haven't been changed since the 1980s.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked about the benefit of publishing the
community-level data.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP answered there is an approval process for
any package liquor store to sell alcohol to rural communities.
They have to identify the person they are selling to. He
reminded that communities have opted to regulate the sale of
alcohol. He said publishing helps communities to examine
collectively the movement of alcohol.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES said she can understand keeping the
records but not publishing the data.
CHAIR KITO said data can provide decision-making tools for the
board.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES reiterated she doesn't understand the need
for publishing the data.
CHAIR KITO said that was a concern that should be addressed
during discussion of the proposed bill.
4:16:19 PM
MS. BRAWLEY addressed Chapter 9 on licenses, endorsements, and
permits. She said all of the proposals would be moved into one
chapter in the bill. She said most license types would not
change, just be renumbered.
MS. BRAWLEY said slides 28-30 show how the system would operate.
She briefly mentioned license types and exemptions. She said
some license types are set for repeal and would be replaced by
an existing license type.
MS. BRAWLEY spoke to population limits. She said the limits
apply only to retail licenses and would not affect wholesale,
manufacturing, tourism, or Winery Direct Shipment licenses.
MS. BRAWLEY spoke to simplifying manufacturing licenses as shown
on slide 32:
• Keep three manufacturing license types:
Brewery (AS 04.11.130), Winery (AS 04.11.140),
Distillery (AS 04.11.170).
• Remove Bottling Works (AS 04.11.120) and Brewpub
(AS 04.11.135) license types from statute.
MS. BRAWLEY explained the definitions for qualifications
for Alaska manufacturing licenses shown on slide 34.
• Require in Brewery, Winery, and Distillery
Manufacturer licenses that at least 80 percent of
alcohol products for sale were made on the Alaska
licensed premises.
• Based on ABC Board regulation for distilleries.
4:21:30 PM
MS. BRAWLEY said that small manufacturers would be allowed
to hold retail licenses. The recommendations appear on
slide 35 as follows:
• Remove the restriction in Prohibited Financial
Interest (AS 04.11.450), which does not allow
manufacturers to hold retail licenses, for
smaller manufacturers.
• Only manufacturers who produce less than a
certain amount of product annually would be
eligible.
• Large manufacturers would be limited to
production.
• The proposed thresholds exceed the current
production of Alaska's largest manufacturing
licensees.
MS. BRAWLEY spoke to the recommendation to allow
manufacturing retail licenses to allow limited onsite
consumption and offsite sales.
• Add-on retail licenses specifically for
manufacturers to allow limited onsite consumption
and offsite sales.
o Existing licensees converted
o New retail licenses have 1:9,000 population
limit
o After 8 years, new licensees limited to only 20
percent of sales volume in retail room, or
waiver from Board
• A separate endorsement for free samples.
MS. BRAWLEY mentioned the onsite and offsite consumption
limits for breweries, wineries, and distilleries.
4:26:41 PM
MS. BRAWLEY discussed recommendations for wholesale
licenses. She indicated there were fewer recommended
changes for this group.
• Adjust fees for both Wholesale licenses (both
defined in AS 04.11.160) to retain current
maximum but reduce burden on small operators.
• Remove the requirement to provide a full list of
suppliers to the ABC Board.
MS. BRAWLEY moved to the recommendations for "Multiple
Licensed Premises with a Beverage Dispensary License" on
slides 42-43.
• Clarify the parameters that would allow and
require multiple fixed counters for a Beverage
Dispensary license (AS 04.11.090).
• Replace Duplicate licenses with Multiple Fixed
Counter endorsements.
• Create a Hotel/Motel endorsement, and a Large
Resort endorsement, which allows additional
licenses in separate buildings.
4:31:04 PM
MS. BRAWLEY spoke to recommendations for pub licensing for
alternating premises on slide 44.
• Allow a university with a Pub license to
designate a second licensed premises, operated
during mutually exclusive hours.
• Example: existing Pub License at UAF (Fairbanks)
could alternate with service of alcohol at the UA
Museum of the North during daytime hours
MS. BRAWLEY spoke to renaming Recreational Site Licenses to
Sporting Event License.
• Ensure the definition of "recreation" is
consistently applied to Recreational Site license
holders.
• Make a sunset provision of 8 years to review and
retire licenses that do not meet this definition
(AS 04.11.210), if they are not in compliance
with the statute.
MS. BRAWLEY spoke to seasonal REPL tourism licenses in
slide 46:
• Seasonal restaurant license
• Available in smaller communities (< 20,000 pop.)
• Same operating requirements and privileges as
full-year restaurants (REPL)
• Number of licenses per community determined by
formula
• Season defined as up to 6 months per year, in any
combination
o Example: May through September + 1 winter
month
MS. BRAWLEY spoke to internet direct sales. She mentioned
that Alaska is one of the few states with no rules about
Internet sales of alcohol. She said that there are
currently no limits purchases of alcohol online from out-
of-state sellers.
• Create a license available to U.S. wineries to
ship orders of wine to Alaska customers.
• Prohibit online sales through this license in
Local Option areas.
• Prohibit other online sales of alcohol not under
this license or the Package Store Shipping
endorsement.
• Modeled on similar licenses or permits for
wineries that exist in 44 other states.
• Requires age verification and delivering to the
customer in person, including a signature to
acknowledge receipt.
• Exempt from Alaska population limits.
4:35:31 PM
MS. BRAWLEY stated one of the motivations regarding the
recommendations for Internet sales was to ensure the state
could collect Alaska Excise Tax for Internet Sales.
• In addition to maintaining current collection of
excise tax on sales from in-state wineries,
require all out-of-state holders of a Winery
Direct Shipment license to pay the same excise
tax on Alaska orders.
• Currently, no tax is collected from online sales
of alcohol to Alaska customers.
• Legal precedent for collecting state alcohol tax
from out-of-state alcohol manufacturers: Granholm
v. Heald (2005)
4:36:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked about brewery manufacturing
licenses. She asked whether an onsite sample provision is
included.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that breweries would need a manufacturing
retail license or a separate retail license.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES surmised there would be a limit to amount
or size of samples.
MS. BRAWLEY answered samples would be limited in the new
proposal.
4:38:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked whether there is a food component in
the pub provision.
MS. BRAWLEY returned to slide 33. She explained there are two
different types of brewpubs in the statute. She said the
Restaurant Eating Place License (REPL) requires sales be 50
percent food. The Beverage Distribution License (BPL) allows
breweries to produce and distribute onsite.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL suggested a brewpub could keep the current
license, produce beer, and have a tasting room.
MS. BRAWLEY answered the license would be converted from the
brewpub license to a brewery license. They could then decide to
get a tasting room license.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL spoke to free sampling. He suggested other
states are either free sampling or for sale sampling states. He
asked whether Alaska is both.
MS. BRAWLEY said that is what is in current law.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL spoke to mental health issues in the state.
He asked whether the proposal contains anything that would help
reduce alcohol problems in the state.
MS. BRAWLEY said that part of the goal is to ensure that the
laws are clear and easy to follow. She said there are
recommendations ensuring that people serving alcohol are trained
and recommendations for safeguarding youth.
4:43:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked about non-profits selling alcohol
during events.
MS. BRAWLEY said for individual licenses she would defer to
AMCO. She said the proposal does not change most of the
permits.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP answered that catering permits would not
change in the proposed bill.
4:45:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked about samples in the various
licenses.
MS. BRAWLEY said that sampling would not change in the retail
license.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked whether there are any ounce limits
in the proposal.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that brewpubs already have retail licenses
and would not be limited. Manufacturers would be limited. She
underlined the ounce limits proposed are for manufacturers.
4:47:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked why public convenience licenses would
be eliminated.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that proposed replacements for the licenses
to be repealed would be addressed further in the presentation.
4:48:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL spoke to seasonal tourism licenses. He gave
the example of Juneau, Alaska, with seasonal establishments that
would go away in the new proposal due to the population limit of
20,000.
MS. BRAWLEY answered the seasonal license would not be
eliminated. She said the proposal is for a new license type and
current operating establishments would not be affected.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL suggested it would curtail any new business.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that the license type does not currently
exist. She said that would mean Juneau, Alaska, businesses
would have to apply for a standard restaurant license.
4:50:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP asking why the recreational license was
being renamed.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that the proposal is merely to rename the
license. She said there is a specific definition for sporting
events and the proposal does not change that definition.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP said that under the Recreational Site
License, a health club could get a beer and wine license. He
said renaming it to involve sporting events, it truly reflects
what the license type was intended to be.
REPRESENTATIVE KNOPP said it seems the proposal attempts to
"tighten the reins" on the definition.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP answered in the affirmative.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked whether the University of Alaska,
Fairbanks pub license is the only pub license in the state.
MS. BRAWLEY answered that is her understanding.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL suggested it would create a license
specifically for the UAF museum. He asked whether the museum
area that served alcohol would be closed off from those under
age.
MS. BRAWLEY said the language states alcohol would have to be
secured on the premises.
CHAIR KITO said there may be other university premises in the
state which may wish to take advantage of the proposal in the
future.
4:55:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked whether consensus has been
achieved among the stakeholders.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP answered that the communication in the group
has been "extraordinary" and the effort to arrive at consensus
has been strong. He mentioned Dale Fox from Alaska Cabaret,
Hotel, Restaurant and Retailers Association (Alaska CHARR). He
said he did not expect the committee to be besieged by industry
members with complaints.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON spoke to the issue of criminal justice
reform. He mentioned Senate Bill 91 and asked whether
Representative Kopp has any comment or recommendation.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP answered that he supports a strong public
safety effort and supports the licensees. He said the
Department of Law had recommended some penalties. He stated the
proposal before the committee predates the 2016 bill.
5:00:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked whether Representative Kopp feels the
proposal is a "tenuous balance."
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP answered that it is a sensitive issue. He
said it takes tremendous consensus to get the proposal to move
forward. He said it is a different kind of a bill due to the
amount of collective work that went into it.
5:02:52 PM
CHAIR KITO said the rest of the presentation could be examined
online.
[HB 357 was held over.]
5:03:51 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Labor and Commerce Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at
5:03 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB357 Sponsor Statement 3.19.2018.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 Supporting Document Title 4 Review 3.19.2018.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 Supporting Documnet - Alaska Alcohol Licenses Proposed Changes 3.19.2018.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 Ver A.PDF |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 HLAC Presentation 4.11.2018.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 Sectional Analysis 3.19.2018.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 Supporting Document - Comprehensive Report Summary 3.19.2018.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 Supporting Document - Internet Sales 3.19.2018.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 Fiscal Note DCCED AMCO 4.6.18.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| SB108 Letters of Support 4.11.18.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB108 Letters of Opposition 4.11.18.pdf |
HL&C 4/11/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SB 108 |